Table of Contents

WHO, WHAT,
WHEN, WHERE

Notables

Grants

Articles published

New publications and projects

COLLEGE CENTENNIAL EVENTS

'Dogs with Dean' & Family Photo, Oct. 7

Centennial Symposium, Oct. 17

Bumpers to speak at Gala, Dec. 3

CSES celebrates Centennial, Oct. 6

Pryor to speak at Poultry Center Anniversary Event, Oct. 27

HEADLINES

Dean's Column

Record high College enrollment, 1,529

Ground broken for Felton Building at Mann Cotton Station

Donors support cattle feed research facility project

Steven Ricke named to Wray Chair for Food Safety

UA enrolls record number, 17,821

CAFLS Alumni Tailgate Party, Oct. 15

Division, ASU & Judd Hill collaborate

Students design learning environment 

Apples delivered to Katrina evacuees

Globe-trekking student

Carnall alumnae celebrate centennial

Students part of Carnall Inn atmosphere

Loewer new ASABE president

ASAE adds 'Biolgical' to name

LFBS Field Day

RREC Field Day

Pine Tree Station Field Day

NEREC Field Day

Poultry students, faculty win awards

Sensing technologies aid mapping

Keeping chicken fresh

New Rosen Center manager


ALL ABOUT ADVISING

Monthly newsletter index

Vision archive index


UA AGRI LINKS

Division of Agriculture

University of Arkansas

Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences

Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station

Cooperative Extension Service

Alumni and Development

Future Students


Vision Credits

Vision is published six times a year by the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station in the U of A System's Division of Agriculture and by the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences. It is produced by the Communication Services unit of the Department of Agricultural and Extension Education, 110 Agriculture Building, U of A, Fayetteville, AR 72701. 479-575-5647.

Editor: Howell Medders, (hmedders@uark.edu).
Web manager: David Edmark (dedmark@uark.edu).
Writers and photographers: Fred Miller and Karen Eskew
Editorial Assistants: Cassandra Cox and Amalie Holland
Broadcast e-mail support: Arkansas Alumni Association

E-mail items for publication in Vision to ahollan@uark.edu

 

 

Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture
Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences

A newsletter for faculty, staff and students

September-October 2005 • Vol. 31, No. 5

Sensing technologies assist mapping of compacted soils

Each pass of a tractor over a field compacts the soil, gradually restricting root growth and inhibiting the plants’ ability to take up water and vital nutrients.

 
Dr. Sreekala Bajwa and graduate student Subodh Kulkarni, of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, measure the reflectance of sunlight from cotton plants in a test plot at the Arkansas Agricultural Research and Extension Center. The measurement of light reflected from the plant canopy can be an indicator of plant health in response to soil compaction.  

Farmers can break up the compaction with deep tillage, called subsoiling, based on measurements that indicate when compaction may have become severe enough to diminish yields. Those measurements are made by manually pushing a probe, called a cone penetrometer, into the soil at numerous points around the fields, said Dr. Sreekala Bajwa, assistant professor of biological and agricultural engineering at the University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture.

“It’s a very time-consuming and labor-intensive process,” Bajwa said. “I’m trying to find a more efficient inspection system using new technologies.”

Bajwa conducts research on agricultural applications for remote sensing instruments for the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Among those applications, she and graduate student Subodh Kulkarni are studying two instrument methods for quickly detecting and mapping soil compaction in cotton fields.

One experimental method uses soil electrical conductivity to measure compaction. Bajwa said the ease with which electrical current can move through soil is determined by soil type, organic content, moisture and compaction.

Bajwa and Kulkarni use electromagnetic instruments that induce electrical currents at a shallow depth of 13 inches and a deeper depth of about 39 inches. The instrument readings are compared against traditional cone penetrometer readings. Biomass, growth and yields from the cotton test plots are also figured into the equation to determine compaction and its effect on the crop.

“The advantage of using soil electrical conductivity is that the instrument can be towed around the field behind a tractor or all-terrain vehicle, taking measurements in a fraction of the time of traditional methods,” Bajwa said.

Another method uses reflected light from the leaf canopy to measure plant performance relative to soil condition.

Kulkarni uses a hand-held sensor connected to an instrument pack on his back and a laptop computer to measure sunlight reflected from both a reference reflector, called a Spectralon panel, and the leaf canopy. The instrument, called a spectro radiometer, measures the difference in reflected light between the two surfaces, expressing the result as a ratio that is correlated to the health of the cotton plants.

The health of the plants is related to water and nutrient stress, Bajwa said. If all the plots are receiving the same amount of water and nutrients, and some of them exhibit more stress, then something is restricting water flow to those plants. All other factors being equal, the culprit must be roots stunted by compacted soil.

“Reflectance can be measured by aircraft or even by satellites,” Bajwa said.

The data from both instrument methods can be mapped using global positioning system (GPS) technology and used to guide variable subsoiling equipment, under development by other engineers, that would deep till only those areas of a field where soil compaction was a problem, Bajwa said.

Bajwa is also trying to determine just how often subsoiling is necessary. She and Kulkarni measure the biomass and yields of plants in the test plots, which are subjected to varying degrees of intentional compaction.

“There is conflicting data on the effects of compaction,” Bajwa said. “We want to provide more accurate information that can prevent unnecessary and costly subsoiling trips over the field.”