|
Table of Contents WHO, WHAT, HEADLINES Undergrad enrollment highest Since 1983 Four new technology-rich classrooms dedicated College and Division exceed campaign goal Bumpers College recruiting videos available in January Bumpers College sweeps NASULGC Southern Region Teaching Awards Emmert named to Poultry Federation Chair Purcell named to Altheimer Soybean Chair Sen. Lincoln speaks at charity luncheon Discovery journal features student scientists Seminar explores 'Human Dimensions of Teaching' CSES honors Outstanding Alumni Horticulture honors alumni and friends Poultry grad students donate 300 turkeys to food bank Debate addresses environmental policies in agriculture RECENT NEWS RELEASES November Crabgrass helps cattle through summer slump October New peaches make 40 fruits in 40 years from U of A OUR WEB NETWORK Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Vision Credits Vision is published six times a year by the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station in the U of A System's Division of Agriculture and by the Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences. It is produced by the Communication Services unit of the Department of Agricultural and Extension Education, 110 Agriculture Building, U of A, Fayetteville, AR 72701. 479-575-5647. Editor: Howell Medders, (hmedders@uark.edu). (E-mail items for Vision to ahollan@uark.edu) |
|
Arkansas
Agricultural Experiment Station, University
of Arkansas Division of Agriculture A
newsletter for faculty, staff and students November-December 2004 Vol. 30, No. 6 Debate addresses environmental policies in agriculture Lawyers with opposing viewpoints argued the role of litigation in the development of environmental policy for agriculture during a debate in Bumpers College Nov. 11.
The Agricultural Business Club and the University of Arkansas Registered Student Organizations sponsored the debate. The featured debaters were Vince Chadick, J.D. of the Bassett Law Firm in Fayetteville and Barclay Rogers, J.D., a staff attorney with the Sierra Club of San Francisco. Chadick is a 1993 graduate of the U of A Law School and has completed his course work for the LL.M. degree in Agricultural Law. Rogers earned his law degree from Lewis and Clark College and his LL.M. in Agricultural Law from the U of A. “The legislative process, particularly at the federal level, offers the most proactive approach to managing natural resources through environmental legislation,” Chadick said. He said existing agricultural and environmental laws were sufficient to promote successful agricultural production while protecting the environment. Rogers said existing voluntary programs were insufficient to protect natural resources. Although litigation is not as efficient as legislation as a tool for protecting the environment, it is often the only way to bring about needed regulatory changes. Jennie Popp, assistant professor of agricultural economics and agribusiness, said the debate was of interest in light of recent litigation over the effects of agricultural production on the Illinois River watershed. It also was of value to agricultural business students in the agricultural law concentration and those studying environmental issues in agriculture. “The purpose of the debate was not to declare a winner, but to share information in order to understand better where each side of the issue is coming from,” Popp said.
|